Don’t Be That Marker

On April 7, 2014, in Being a GA/TA, Teaching Tips, by gregorynpaziuk

Not all markers get a passing grade. More than likely we’ve all had sloppy markers we’d like to fail for the way they seem to disregard best practice and common decency. So we put together this list of mistakes not to make when marking student papers, exams, and the like to make sure your students don’t wish they could flunk you.

  1. Image courtesy of Tony Vincent.

    Image courtesy of Tony Vincent.

    Don’t give lazy feedback. Lazy feedback can be defined as anything that doesn’t give your students direction, lead them to reflect, or connect to course content. For example, the comment “Awkward/Revise” doesn’t give any constructive suggestions on how your student might improve, nor does it identify what’s awkward about the section of note, nor does it relate the issue to the relevant course content. You won’t always have time for lengthy comments (nor are they always needed on final exams), but assess what’s appropriate for the situation. Also, don’t forget that your comments act as a guide for your thoughts.

  2. Don’t take the “one comment fits all” approach. It may save time to put together generic comments, especially for summative and concluding comments, but these formulas likely won’t capture what was actually important about your students’ assignments. At the very least, if you are going to reuse phrasing in your comments, make sure you also include specific references to the important parts of their assignment (e.g., “Your examination of Karl Marx’s theories seems to neglect the issue of class struggle”, NOT “Your examination of Karl Marx’s theories seems to be missing some elements.”).
  3. Don’t write illegible notes. Practice your prescription scratching somewhere else. Students are going to want to be able to read their marks and your comments whether they’ve aced the test or flunked the essay. Moreover, in an ideal world, the more clearly your feedback reads (and is understood), the fewer questions you’ll field from confused and/or disgruntled students.
  4. Don’t forget to check your math. We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again: mistakes do happen. When compiling grades, always check your math at least fifty times, give or take.
  5. Don’t forget to point out the good stuff. It’s not that you should mince words or skirt criticism, but students need to know what they are doing well too. That’s partially because we could all use a little encouragement now and then, but also because, as Peter Elbow argues, “good writing teachers like student writing (and like students)”. Whether you’re a writing teacher or a biology instructor, don’t under-estimate the power of liking your students’ work.
  6. Don’t mix up assignments. Have you ever had a reviewer tell you your paper was good but that your last example with the fire truck was not clear, only the problem is that the fire truck example was in your friend’s paper, not yours? Sure, you laugh now, but graders mix up assignments in final comments all the time, especially when they mark one question at a time and forget to read over their comments. Don’t be that grader. Really, don’t.
  7. Don’t contradict the guidelines/rubric. The assignment description and whatever directions, criteria, guidelines, objectives, or rubrics it comes with are what your students will be using when putting together their answers. Whenever you go “off-script” and start grading according to some unwritten rule, momentary whim, or new paradigm. Consistency is the name of the game.
  8. Don’t compare your students to yourself. First of all, because it’s vain and you’re better than that. More importantly, your students are at a different level of development than you. Be realistic in the expectations you have for them.

Read more in Elbow, Peter. (1994). “Ranking, Evaluating, Liking: Sorting Out Three Forms of Judgment.” College English 55(2), 187-206.
Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=peter_elbow

 

Still not sure what the GATA Awards are all about? We’ve been catching up with more past winners to give you a sense of what the awards have meant to those they recognize. Now we’re sharing their feedback.

Melanie Santarossa was recognized with the GA/TA Award for Educational Practice in 2011 for her work in English Composition 26-100. Her thoughtful approach and considerable expertise later brought Melanie to the GATA Network where she was the GATA Handbook Editor. Here’s Melanie’s profile from the 2011 GATA Awards:

melaniesantatrossaMelanie Santarossa (English)
The quality of Melanie’s work and understanding of teaching, learning, and assessment was evident throughout her   nomination dossier. Not only has she worked at mastering a breadth of pedagogical approaches, she has integrated them into a coherent personal teaching style, in which the cognitive, affective and performative dimensions of her teaching are reflectively aligned. Her teaching strategies are systematic, active, and appropriately pitched for students at various levels. Melanie has also become active in teaching and learning communities locally, provincially and nationally.

Nowadays, Melanie works as an educational developer at OCAD University’s Faculty and Curriculum Development Centre. There she works on just about everything from professional and personal development workshops for faculty to curriculum redesign. We caught up with Melanie to ask about her experience with the GATA Awards and the difference between educational practice and educational leadership.

What was the most difficult part of the nomination process? Why?
The most difficult part of the nomination process was gathering all the materials needed to showcase my teaching (lesson plans, classroom activities, reference letters from students and mentors, etc). However, because of undergoing this process, I now have all of these materials organized and continue to add to the collection. It’s a great process for reflecting on one’s teaching.

Had teaching and learning been a big part of your life before you won the award? How did the award change your views on teaching?
Yes, teaching and learning was a part of my life before I won the award. In fact, I was very much involved with the Centre for Teaching and Learning long before I put my name forward. The award confirmed that enhancing teaching and learning at the university level is an ever growing (and important) movement, and to be a part of that movement is invigorating indeed.

How do you differentiate between educational practice and educational leadership? What types of things do you include in your personal practice?
For me, educational practice is what happens each day in and outside of the classroom that impacts classroom learning (preparing lessons, creating assignments, designing rubrics, facilitating discussions, lecturing, etc). Educational leadership is that which propels others into teaching and learning (sharing teaching resources with colleagues, volunteering to be a book reviewer for the Educational Developer’s Caucus, conducting scholarship of teaching and learning, etc).

How has the GATA Award impacted your life, if at all?
It may have have been one of the selling features of my CV when I applied for my first full-time job in educational development.