If you’ve ever had to hand in any scholarly writing you’ll likely be familiar with the “cryptic hieroglyphics”, that is, written comments provided for feedback. Written commentary can be hard to read and relatively generic, so you’ll be happy to hear that it is not the only option for providing criticism.

Audio-recorded response is beginning to be recognized as an effective alternative to written commentary, with its benefits cited as being detailed, personable, and timesaving. This variation in the approach to feedback suggests a shift away from judgment and toward mentorship.

This bibliography highlights audio response as an evolving feedback strategy and reviews a growing body of literature that dates back to 1958.

Also, this video further supports the argument for audio commenting, taking a focus on pedagogy and practice.

How might you use audio response in place of traditional written comments?
We invite you to share your thoughts!